Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Smith's avatar

For the click-through rates, I might have a few hundred folks take a look at something I wrote, and then like 3 people will click on a link. I drop maybe like 10 links into a typical post, just embedded as a clickable word or phrase like Wikipedia does, but there are few takers.

For the multimedia stuff, I know that I get into a particular zone where I listen to music while I'm substackin', so when there's a clickable video or audio file, I pretty much don't ever click. I wonder if others are in that boat as well, and if there's maybe a workaround that takes them into account too.

Also, I just read Daniel's comment and it's pretty much what I was going to say, but with better words.

Expand full comment
Daniel Nest's avatar

Two things here, not sure how helpful they are.

For me personally, the reason I often don't check out video or audio content when reading a Substack post is that at that point I'm very likely in "reading" mode. Very often, I'm on public transport or another situation where engaging with any content that isn't text would be tricky or disturb others (I don't always have my earphones handy.) Case in point: I'm reading this at the ice skating rink with music blaring and other parents around me while my daughter is on her figure skating practice. So then I'll focus on the text and move on, probably forgetting to return to the audio/video stuff.

Two, you can definitely add more than a single piece of audio or video into a single Substack post. See most of my Sunday Rundowns where I upload multiple audio and video files inside the post. Or maybe I've misunderstood your issue?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts